Uga Media - Electronic Publishing
S-Tech Engineers are Manufacturers & Suppliers of Chemical Earthing Equipment & Systems
Independent Media - Vallejonews Portal - Article City - Command Post - World Buy Direct - Press Box - Free Articles - Free Press Release - TTnet Manufacturers and Suppliers Directory
4ecotips provides Global Warming News and Environment Education Tips
International Movers Canada - Get quotations, compare prices and find your Mover
Mantas Translations from English to Greek and vice versa
CloudeKE Directory - Virtual Assistance - Online Web Directory - New Dimension - Peak Oil Info - Anti War
The purpose of the present article is to join the Anti-War Movement and Consumer Unions, in order to influence our politicians in our Countries (where each of us lives). So, the information within this web site is primarily provided for legal negotiations about the crude oil prices, while the Investing Community must constantly be in lawful alertness, in order to bring the Portable Power Supplies to Energy Market.
Besides, the OPEC constitutes a cartel that opposes the Free Market Economy while the troops gathering in gulf area, in Autumn of 2002 for the Iraq "democratization" rose the crude oil prices beyond the 25$ / barrel AND with various OPEC pretexts, the today's oil prices are totally in the dock.
There are verbal denunciations about the oil firms or International Petroleum Exchange while the IPE or firms say that the oil reserves remain huge, the truth is entire opposite. In this way, the today's absonant prices are going to finance the last depleted oil reserves which means that the peak oil Age has come before the Invasion in Iraq (the "democratization" was just an initial pretext to overcome the 25$/barrel barrier).
The denouncers say that the OPEC cartel does not want to permit (but does declare) the peak oil Era for the sake of Caspian region. Moreover, the OPEC has repeatedly blamed the heavy taxation of the majority of oil-importing countries, while the importing companies may not care about the contract prices (the Consumers pay higher).
The most exciting OPEC pretext is the Oil Demand from China and India. These two countries have export-oriented Economies (as the whole south-eastern Asia Region) and need their currencies to be depreciated see the american charges against China for the super-competitive chinese products, due to intentionally cheap Yuan. Well, how can all these Nations seek oil with such absonant prices? The OPEC pretexts also include alleged rising gasoline demand in United States, severe cold in north hemisphere or weather conditions in Central America, legal conflicts between the russian state and Yukos Oil, various internal conflicts inside the OPEC countries such as Nigeria or Venezuela etc.
Well, in 1998, when the crude oil prices had toppled at nine US$ / barrel, did not people want oil or gasoline for heating in winter or car trips in summer? Was our World without typhoons or excessive cold in March? without russian crises? without regional conflicts? Does anyone out there remember a year of the past without typhoons in Central America? What about the financial crisis (and scandals) in Russia in 1998 (resulting from the russian failure to eliminate the magnetic data storage media)? In the next year (1999), the Russian President Boris Yeltsin had declared in the Mass Media Globally that the two thirds of the russian economy are found on criminals' hands!!! So, what speculators and OPEC try to do?
Dear Consumers, without legal pressure by anti-speculation measures, the crude and retail oil prices become unchecked. Therefore, the various Consumer Unions and Activist Groups around the World must evolve legal initiatives, if we (the Consumers) want regular oil prices in the long term see press release.
The Third World Development requires among others cheap fuels and clean water the Poor People around the World can NOT buy expensive oil and gasoline. And if the oil industry is not able to offer regular prices, then should we suffer from oil wars or democratization processes of relevant nations?
The violence gets endless (who is next?), while some experts say that the Enron collapse days were perfect for permanent oil settlement and all of us can ask about the Legality of the "war on terrorism". And Al Qaeda has declared that the War in Iraq is the REASON (in law science, CAUSE) of their attacks on Europe or everywhere on the World. The muslim countries whose governments support the "western crusaders" in Iraq, also run the gauntlet due to the same CAUSE: Iraq War. Regardless of the withdrawal of US troops, the kamikaze-attacks on Iraq soil REMAIN in full blast. And Iran invokes energy needs to support its nuclear program.
So, an International Public Prosecutor is competent to bring into Court the Transition of our Society to the PPS Age. This means that the Court (consisting of Different Tribes, so that there is Multi-Cultural Representation) will only verify the peak oil Age and may modify or add on to the Integrated Services to temporarily unemployed People.
The governments are advised to devolve monetary competencies to the private banks and insurance companies, in order to arrange corruption issues over the full board service. The private banks & insurance companies regardless of their undermining through the credit crisis have motive to protect the banknotes value (money) from any corruption or inflation (waste of fundings). ALL the People will see the work as a pleasure with the Drastic Reduction of Working Time and Spare Time for the Amenities of Life. No One will have motive to do harm to anyone and our World (All The Tribes) will be based on the feeling of togetherness, supported by the LOW Cost Of Living and Free Services.
Therefore, the local Prosecutors will only give the order to the private banks and insurance companies to provide the full board service to temporarily unemployed People. Thus, any Investors have the Indefeasible Right to influence International Judicial Authorities for a Campaign of PPS Awareness.
The islamic state (ISIS or caliphate), in both Iraq and Syria areas, would NOT exist today IF the local oil refineries had stopped their operation since 2001. It goes without saying that any islamic reprisals due to western intervention for the Middle East "Democratization" (including the Iraq & Syria Civil Wars), IMPLY Compensations for Victims' Families around the Globe (including the Victims within Islamic Nations), according to the 9/11 Compensation Fund: These wars would NOT happen IF the PPS were on the storeshelves since 2001. Due to these wars, we have the Stockholm terror attack with truck, in April of 2017. Sweden is the country of origin of the ISIS fighters majority (the islamic state loses land, so its soldiers want revenge). And in May of 2017, we have the Manchester Massacre.
The above imply that the Relatives of the Passengers at the explosion of russian airplane of 2015 over Sinai, DESERVE Compensations from EITHER Russian OR Western (USA, UK, french etc), fuel industry corporations; the causality connection begins with the 9/11 attacks and goes on up to our days. The russian participation to Syria bombing GAVE jihadists the right to explode the airplane.
Regarding the Ukrainian crisis, the local politicians DO NOT SAY the truth to the Ukrainian folk, about the European Prospect of Ukraine. The Supreme Court Of Greece decided in 2010 that the natural gas can NOT come to Greece as in the rest Europe. This means that the gas pipelines will NOT transfer the russian natural gas of Gazprom through the ukrainian land. To this point, the 2014's shooting down of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Would NOT Happen IF the PPS were on the storeshelves since 2001; Russia & Ukraine would not have any dispute about the natural gas of Gazprom. This means that the Passengers' loved ones DESERVE Compensations according to the 9/11 Compensation Fund.
Regarding the attacks of 2014 against some cities of France, wherever exists religious motive, ALL the Victims and their Families DESERVE Compensations from their local (french) fuel corporations. For example, in Nantes and Tours, the religious motives are UNDOUBTED. For the Dijon case, there is a terrorism doubt, according to the local prosecutor. But according to some news reports, even in Dijon case, there is terrorism link.
Similarly, the Tragedy of January of 2015 against the Magazine Offices in Paris (France again), as well as the attacks of February against the cafe in Copenhagen (Denmark), WOULD NOT HAPPEN IF the PPS were on the storeshelves since 2001. The 9/11 RUIN sowed the seeds of hatred between Islam and Christianity, resulting in brain-washing of islamists & christians. This one, also applies to the German / Iranian Killer, soon after the Nice massacre, in Munich - Germany, in July of 2016. The killer insulted Immigrants before he shoots. In addition, the Quebec Mosque Attack in Canada, late January of 2017, is also a result of the mentioned hatred. Further, the June 19th London Mosque Attack case also applies to this hatred, as well as the Hamburg knife attacker (in late July of 2017) who shouted "Allahu akbar" or God is greatest. And in August of 2017, we have the Barcelona massacre, while two months later, we have the Marseille knife attack (October 1st) AND Manhattan (New York City) truck attack (October 31st - Halloween Day). This means that the Victims' Families DESERVE Compensations according to the 9/11 Compensation Fund.
The above imply that the Paris Massacre of November of 2015, as well as the Brussels attacks of March of 2016, WERE AN ACT against Multi-Culturism, which is in charge by many politicians (mainly conservatives but even socialists). The catch in this charge consists in the FACT that this peaceful co-existence of muslims & christians WAS UNDERMINED by the 9/11 disaster (war-on-terror). The so-called "lone wolves" TRY TO REVENGE the West for its Impudence and Arrogance. It goes without saying that ALL the Families of Victims of the Paris & Brussels Massacre DESERVE Compensations according to the above Fund. The same legal terms apply to the Mali attacks, soon after the Paris attacks. The same chain causation for Compensations applies to the San Bernardino shootings in California (USA), early December of 2015, as well as the London - UK attacks in March of 2017. And on June 3rd of 2017, we have the London Bridge attack ("lone wolf" cases).
The massacre of Florida bar (USA) in June of 2016, as well as the Orlando Airport attacks in January of 2017, also imply Compensations for the Families of Victims, according to the 9/11 attacks. Furthermore, the truck driver who killed 86 people in Nice - France, in July of 2016, WAS a "lone wolf". The mass media try to introduce the French killer case as an event, independent from the jihadists. See the Syrian refugee case who blew himself up on July 24th in the Bavarian city of Ansbach, which is clearly ISIS related, injuring 15 people (four of them seriously). Additionally, a 17-year-old Afghan refugee armed with an axe and a knife wounded five people on a train near Würzburg - Bavaria (Germany). Similarly, a Somali refugee caused calamity in Ohio (USA), late November of 2016. And in December of 2016, we have the Berlin truck attacks. In April of 2017, we have the St. Petersburg metro attacks AND 1st Egypt massacre in May 0f 2017, we have the 2nd Egypt massacre. In September of 2017, we have the London train terrorist attack. Of course, IF the PPS were on the marketplace since 2001, NEITHER the religious hatred NOR the islamic state would exist today. So, ALL the relevant People DESERVE Compensations, as the 9/11 Families.
1. Is it legal that a politician makes references to terror events that himself and some of his party members have caused? (this one applies to 9/11 attacks and former Bush Administration).
2. Is it legal that a politician makes correlations between the "war on terror" (9/11 attacks) and a national issue (a former Soviet Union republic i.e. Chechnya seeks its independence from the Russian Federation) WHEN similar actions there were BEFORE September 11 2001? (Hospital siege at Southern Russia in 1995 this one applies to Russian President Vladimir Putin and his '90s predecessor Boris Yeltsin for the initial Russian invasion in Chechnya, in December of 1994).
3. Is it legal that the Leaders of our today's world exploit the various national conflicts around the World in order to promote oil or gas pipelines at every bombed area, by tearing out the public opinion's attention and investors' funds?
The last question is referred to the Hot Wars after the End Of Cold War:
1990-1991, Gulf War.
1991-1995, Bosnia War.
1994-1996, the first Russian War against Chechnya.
1999 Spring, NATO bombings against Serbia.
1999 Autumn to date, the second Russian War against Chechnya.
2001, terror attacks against USA with the pretext of Arabian-Israeli conflict and continued western support to Israelis.
2001, Afghanistan War (with frequent deadly Taliban attacks against Western soldiers to date).
2003 to date, Iraq War and so on.
In all the above wars, each time a country was bombarded, the Mass Media globally were talking about alleged passes (and "toll rates") of oil or gas pipelines through the area of that country. For example, in 1999, the Balkans pipelines came into fashion. From 2001, the central Asia pipelines are in fashion.
To this point, the Sydney Massacre of 2014, would NOT happen IF the PPS were on the storeshelves since 2001. The Iranian killer (or jihadist according to some news reports) SAID that his attack was REPRISALS for the Australian Participation in Afghanistan Bombings, since 2001. This means that the Victims' Families, as well as the Frightened Crowd within the cafeteria, DESERVE Compensations according to the 9/11 Compensation Fund. The same legal terms for Compensations also apply to New York and New Jersey attacks of September of 2016. The Afghan Killer IS RELATED to the Afghanistan War since 2001.
Well, whatever country is bombed after the End Of Cold War, there is always a different pipelines scenario for that area! And what about the Wars' Impacts on Humans Health? Does everyone out there know about the depleted uranium bombs (NATO,1999) and their effects to the ground? The leukaemia cases of local Population and foreign soldiers? The leukaemia cases due to contaminated agricultural products (exported to neighbouring countries including Greece)?
ARE ALL THE ABOVE LEGAL?
IT IS SURE THAT THEY ARE NOT.
Please spread the word out: EnergyNews.gr Electric Power Production From Magnetic Tapes. It is our Constitutional Right to influence our politicians, political parties and Business People. I kindly ask you to do "like" at http://www.facebook.com/PPSPoliticalParty even if you do not know greek language.
After all, many People believe that the USSR formation in the early of 20th century was a "history mistake". If Pierre Proudhon Ideas had won Marx ideas during the 19th century, then the today's industrialized nations would enjoy a true prosperity with social justice based on equal opportunities etc. However, these discussions require TV Stations and talk shows, while the Internet medium is not sufficient for such controversies.
And if the "war on terror" did not exist, the natural disasters (such as the Haiti earthquake, Pakistan floods and hurricane Haiyan) would affect the Public Opinion as a an ethical Quest for where our Civilization is headed instead of the today's emotional comparison of the Number of Victims in the two cases (terrorism and natural disasters) and the consequent cover-up of terrorism by natural catastrophes.
IF a dictatorship is going to take place in Greece, I REALLY doubt about the EnergyNews.gr web site MAINTENANCE. The "benefit" of such a dictatorship would be the introduction of natural gas to the greek households (since Trump wonders Putin). This introduction, of course, IS ABSOLUTELY ILLEGAL because it infringes the Decision of 2010 of the Supreme Court Of Greece. Besides, ONLY the Elected Governments are LEGAL.
I do appeal to the current greek government to PREVENT a dictatorship, by bringing the PPS on the storeshelves so that the salaries of Greek Armed Forces remain stable. I hope that this update will lead to the cancellation of any coup d'etat plans in Greece.
In summary, I mention that I do not make any intervention to the internal affairs of Russia or any other Country. Just I post this article as an internet activism, as if I was a journalist. Thanks.
Questions & Answers - Project Description - Business Plan - Link Exchange